<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Morgellons Watch &#187; MRF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morgellonswatch.com/category/mrf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morgellonswatch.com</link>
	<description>Resources for Morgellons investigators. Skeptical analysis and discussion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SUNY SEM Morgellons Fiber Photos</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/12/12/suny-sem-morgellons-fiber-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/12/12/suny-sem-morgellons-fiber-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/12/12/suny-sem-morgellons-fiber-photos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some new photos on the MRF web site, including this one: Which is captioned: &#8220;Ribbon-like fiber coated with minerals with a cylindrical fiber and faceted fiber adjacent&#8220;, with the implication being that this is some unusual fiber only found in Morgellons patients. But let me set this photo in a larger context: I&#8217;ve <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/12/12/suny-sem-morgellons-fiber-photos/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some <a href="http://www.morgellons.com/SUNY%20Images.htm">new photos on the MRF web site</a>, including this one:</p>
<p><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/new_pa3-1.jpg" alt="new_pa3-1.jpg" /></p>
<p>Which is captioned: &#8220;<em>Ribbon-like fiber coated with minerals with a cylindrical fiber and faceted fiber adjacent</em>&#8220;, with the implication being that this is some unusual fiber only found in Morgellons patients.   But let me set this photo in a larger context:</p>
<p><a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/combined-cotton2.jpg" title="combined-cotton2.jpg"><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/combined-cotton2.jpg" alt="combined-cotton2.jpg" height="432" width="567" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken the MRF photo and scaled it to the exact same scale as another (larger) photo.  I&#8217;ve also taken two more photos and overlaid them to show detail of the &#8220;mineral&#8221; coated fiber. One image is just to the right of the middle, and the other is in the left. Note all I did here was rotate the images and moved them to similar regions.    The images have been scaled to match (note the 100µm and the 10&#215;10µm scales).  Note the undamaged fibers are the exact same size, shape and texture in both photos, while the middle damaged fiber almost exactly matches the overlaid segments of damaged fiber.</p>
<p>All images are of <strong>cotton</strong>.  The larger background image is of cotton thread, from <a href="http://www.aber.ac.uk/bioimage/image/image.htm">here</a>, the second inset image is of a water-damaged cotton fiber from <a href="http://aic.stanford.edu/jaic/articles/jaic40-02-002.html">here</a>.  Click on the above photo to zoom in and examine the cotton more closely.  Note that they have the exact same &#8220;minerals&#8221; sprinkled over them.  And not that the damaged fiber shows damage in the same way as the &#8220;Morgellons&#8221; fiber.  Also the &#8220;faceted&#8221; fiber could quite possibly be a faceted fiber, like extruded polyester, but could equally well be a slightly twisted cotton fiber, such as those in the lower right.</p>
<p>Hence, the most likely explanation is that these are cotton, from any of: cotton bandages, cotton wool or cotton clothing.</p>
<p>Original images are linked below, click them to see full versions:</p>
<p><a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/jaic40-02-002-ch2fg6.jpg" title="jaic40-02-002-ch2fg6.jpg"><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/jaic40-02-002-ch2fg6.thumbnail.jpg" alt="jaic40-02-002-ch2fg6.jpg" /></a> <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/jaic40-02-002-ch2fg4.jpg" title="jaic40-02-002-ch2fg4.jpg"><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/jaic40-02-002-ch2fg4.thumbnail.jpg" alt="jaic40-02-002-ch2fg4.jpg" height="86" width="255" /></a><a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/uwbl-0412-w.jpg" title="uwbl-0412-w.jpg"><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/uwbl-0412-w.thumbnail.jpg" alt="uwbl-0412-w.jpg" height="86" width="113" /></a></p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aber.ac.uk/bioimage/image/image.htm">http://www.aber.ac.uk/bioimage/image/image.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aic.stanford.edu/jaic/articles/jaic40-02-002.html">http://aic.stanford.edu/jaic/articles/jaic40-02-002.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/12/12/suny-sem-morgellons-fiber-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgellons Patient Zero</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/10/10/morgellons-patient-zero/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/10/10/morgellons-patient-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2007/10/12/morgellons-patient-zero/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The name “Morgellons” was first used by Mary Leitao, the founder of the Morgellons Research Foundation, and for a long time the story of Morgellons has been underpinned on the story of her son, on whose lip she found a few fibers, and from this extrapolated a new disease. Other people with various problems looked <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/10/10/morgellons-patient-zero/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rgj.com/news/stories/html/2004/05/08/70307.php"><img src="/images/Mary-Leitao-and-son.jpg" align="right" height="316" width="250" /></a>The name “Morgellons” was first used by Mary Leitao, the founder of the Morgellons Research Foundation, and for a long time the story of Morgellons has been underpinned on the story of her son, <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/04/11/objects-emerging-from-lesion-on-childs-lip-are-kleenex-fibers/">on whose lip she found a few fibers</a>, and from this extrapolated a new disease. Other people with various problems looked and found fibers (since <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/04/11/fibers-are-everywhere/">fibers are everywhere</a>, if you get a microscope, you’ll find fibers), Leitao identified with the problems these people had in dealing with their doctors, and the MRF was born.</p>
<p>Recently the MRF has been undergoing some changes. A month ago <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/11/the-mrfs-new-theory/">a number of outlandish speculations</a> were scattered over the MRF’s web site, and then the next day they were first toned down, and then removed. The writings were the work of William Harvey.</p>
<p>Then yesterday the web site was updated for the first time since those changes, and included a new page on financial info. There was a new newsletter, discussing how they were shifting from raising awareness, to raising funds. There was a new address for sending contributions, changing from a PO box in Pittsburgh, PA (Leitao), to one near Albany, NY.</p>
<p>But, perhaps most interesting is that the story of how it started has been removed from from the front page and the FAQ.</p>
<p>Deleted From the Front Page</p>
<blockquote><p>The name, Morgellons disease, was used as a temporary label by the mother of a two-year-old boy who developed symptoms of this disease in 2001. In 2002, after establishing the MRF in honor of her child, this mother was contacted by people in all 50 states and across the globe who reported symptoms of this disease.</p></blockquote>
<p>Deleted from the FAQ:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoBodyText"><strong><span style="color: windowtext">Why was the Morgellons Research Foundation established?</span> </strong></p>
<p><span>The Morgellons Research Foundation (MRF) was founded by the mother of a two-year old child with an unknown illness. When unable to find the proper help for her child, she labeled his illness “Morgellons disease” and established the MRF to raise awareness of the disease and funds for research.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Why is this? Why start to downplay the “Patient Zero”, the first person identified as having “Morgellons”, someone who is mentioned in practically every media story on Morgellons? I suspect the reason is that he simply does not fit with Harvey’s new theory. Harvey is getting ready to publish some speculation based on specious statistical analysis and some isolated observations, and “Patient Zero” simply does not fit into his new theory, so he’s getting rid of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/10/10/morgellons-patient-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The MRF&#8217;s New Theory</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/11/the-mrfs-new-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/11/the-mrfs-new-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2007/09/11/the-mrfs-new-theory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[EDIT: The following lists changes made to the MRF Web site on 9/11/2007, deleting several of the additions of 9/10. Shortly after writing this, the MRF web site reverted back to a version from a week ago, with all the new material on filarial worms removed The full 9/10 text of these pages can be <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/11/the-mrfs-new-theory/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[EDIT:  The following lists changes made to the MRF Web site on 9/11/2007, deleting several of the additions of 9/10. Shortly after writing this, the MRF web site reverted back to a version from a week ago, with <em><strong>all </strong></em>the new material on filarial worms removed  The full 9/10 text of these pages can be found here: <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/about-2/mrf-filaria/"> http://morgellonswatch.com/about-2/mrf-filaria/</a> ]</p>
<p><img src="/images/Onchocerca-cervicalis.jpg" alt="Onchocerca cervicalis (Horse worm)" align="right" height="239" width="365" />It seems like someone at the MRF was a little over-eager to share their new theory with the world.   Yesterday the MRF web site was suddenly changed from cautious suggestion that Morgellons is related to Lyme disease, to wide ranging speculation of animal worms and rare bacterial infections.  These new theories are rather out of keeping with the prior tone of the MRF, and this make me wonder if a new hand is at the helm.</p>
<p>But then today,  many of these statements were removed as quickly as they were added.  Did cooler head prevail?  Is there some internal debate at the MRF? Why are the thought processes of an organization being reflected on their web pages in this manner?   Can the media continue to give the MRF any credence in light of these unorthodox claims?</p>
<p>The changes to the MRF are happening so fast that you probably never noticed them.  Here are some of the more interesting changes between 9/10/2007 and 9/11/2007:</p>
<p>On the &#8220;Case Definition&#8221;, deletions in <font color="#ff0000"><strong>red</strong></font>:</p>
<blockquote><p> This phenomenon is distinctly similar to the mass movement of microfilaria <strong><font color="#ff0000">produced by intravascular adult Filaria typically between 1 and 4 AM</font>.</strong><br />
&#8230;<br />
5. <strong><u>Musculoskeletal effect</u></strong> is manifest in several ways. <strong>Pain</strong> distribution is broad, and can include joint(s), muscles, tendons and connective tissue. Both vascular and “pressure” <strong>headaches, and vertebral pain</strong> are extremely common, the latter usually with premature signs of <strong>degeneration (e.g., age 20) of both discs and vertebrae</strong>. <strong><font color="#ff0000">All are characteristics of disseminated Actinomyces species</font></strong><br />
&#8230;<br />
4. <strong><u>Acute changes in skin texture and pigment</u></strong>. The skin is variously thickened and thinned, with irregular texture and hyperpigmentation pattern. Hyper-growth phenomena are common (nevi, skin tags, microangioma, lipomas, callus formation and Morphea).<strong> <font color="#ff0000">A common characteristic of infection with <em>Onchocerca cervicalis</em> (A filarial species).</font></strong></p>
<p>5. <strong><u>Arthralgias</u></strong><u>.</u> Frequently reported, WITHOUT ARTHRITIS. Common joints are fingers, shoulders, knees and lower vertebrae. <strong><font color="#ff0000">Common in chronic <em>Dracunculus insignis</em></font></strong> infection. (A filarial species)</p></blockquote>
<p>On the welcome page,  this was removed:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><font color="#ff0000"> Curiously, NO serious search for parasites exists in the published medical literature</font></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>also removed, regarding the CDC:</p>
<blockquote><p> <strong><font color="#ff0000">but without a plan to explore and define the true illness they are intending to address. Although it is highly unlikely the CDC will have moved beyond the initial RFP process when peer-reviewed papers reveal the nature, etiology and solution of this illness, we are pleased they are willing to explore it. There will always be a large amount of verification and clarification work to be done as well as medication optimization.</font></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Then the FAQ:</p>
<blockquote><p>The actual     unnamed disease represented by the <em>Morgellons</em> label is vastly     different from DOP. A recent systematic study of similar patients has     unequivocally verified infection in most <strong><font color="#ff0000">with more than one species of     zoonotic Filaria and all with unexpected overgrowth of a common commensal     bacterium, <em>Actinomycosis israelii</em>. Both are treatable. The second     large illness component found in these patients is indeed an episodic     delusional state and a verifiable high prevalence of bipolar disease. Review     of available NLM data corroborates only that the presence of delusion has     been assumed the genesis of imagined infestation with parasites <em>without     ever having considered or tested for</em> <em>parasites</em>. Use of even a     Mattel microscope would have revealed the Actinomycosis spread,</font></strong> and a simple     CBC and CBC will show the elevated monocytosis, abnormal red cell indices,     frequently elevated calcium and low potassium.Available, but more specific     tests readily reveal elevated inflammatory markers, elevated cytokines     confronting chronic infection, and a chronic immune deficiency state     resulting in activation of most herpes viruses, many zoonoses, and of course     parasites of a still unknown number and species. Physical effects are to     skin, brain, peripheral nerves, cardiac conduction, autonomic nervous system     function, and hormonal effect. Debilitating subjective symptoms include     local or general chronic pain, chronic malaise, and unusual but nonetheless     well-documented dermal inter-plane movement <strong><font color="#ff0000">of <em>Onchocerca volvulus</em>.</font></strong><br />
&#8230;<br />
The     typical skin lesions vary but fall into at least two distinct types. One     consists of near-circular (about one cm) bluish colored scars that persist     for decades but begin as one mm raised lesions followed by weeping ulcers.     The second are eczematous-like. All occur most frequently on distal limbs or     the back or face. <font color="#ff0000"><strong>The Filaria species commonly identified clearly create the     second type lesion. The first, when lesions are in clusters, may be     Actinomycosis or when not clustered, Filaria. Actinomycosis lesions may     itch, but Filaria dermatoses itch with incredible ferocity</strong>.</font><br />
&#8230;<br />
Some physicians are attempting to treat patients     with this illness, although they do not understand its cause. The disease we     are addressing exists incorrectly labeled in medical texts as <em>Delusions     of Parasitosis</em>. Because of this, cookbook clinicians will necessarily     assume you are psychotic or delusional and look no further. In truth,     prescription of psychopharmacological agents will help many patients with     emotional discomfort&#8230;a real part of the illness. However, these drugs DO     NOT address <strong><font color="#ff0000">the actual parasite infestation readily treated with anti-helmenthics.     Psychiatric drugs, again, do not address other components of the disease,     but all may eventually respond to drugs that target the Chlamydophila     species. THE LATTER REMAINS TO BE PROVEN</font>.</strong><br />
&#8230;<br />
As adequate funding becomes available, we <strong><font color="#ff0000">are     required by law to</font></strong> regularly post the progress and findings on the     Foundation website <strong><font color="#ff0000">so as each of us contributes, we can see the result</font></strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>These almost sound like the theories of <a href="http://www.healingresearch.org/index.html">George Schwartz</a>, or perhaps Neelam Uppal.  But my best bet is still William Harvey, although I think it&#8217;s odd that there is no mention of <em>borrelia burgdorferi </em>(Lyme).  Harvey has previous given credence to a wide range of  opportunistic parasitic infections based on <em>borrelia burgdorferi  </em>infection reducing immunity.</p>
<p>Having looked at the deletions, lets look at something that is still there:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Is     it contagious?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Science     must answer that question to be certain. However, most data obtained to date     strongly suggest this possibility. Its’ mechanism does not appear simple     or straightforward. Suggestive data include its appearance in many family     members, the finding of parasites, activation of infectious herpes viruses,     and low-level identification of antibodies to various zoonotic bacterial     antibodies. Many infectious agents can, of course, be transferred by     intermediate vectors such as flies. But lack of these expected vectors in     many regions of prevalence suggest silent inter-human transfer. The most     recent strong hypothesis suggests that an inter-human infectious agent,     easily spread by droplet transmission is initially responsible for creating     a chronic immune deficiency state. Only such a state might account for the     extreme number and types of activated agents that have become measurable and     chronic. Its movement is likely silent because of the time for second-agent     expression. If highly similar other chronic illnesses turn out to be     generated by this initiating agent, the numbers infected are already     enormous, so attempts at avoidance near useless now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s rather a ramble, but I think that&#8217;s Harvey saying that it&#8217;s airborne transmission of <em>borrelia burgdorferi </em>, which causes a chronic immune deficiency state, which allows all these exotic parasites (the &#8220;second agents&#8221;) to infect you.   He also suggests that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and a lot of other illness are also caused by this, and hundreds of millions of people are infected.  This tallies with his paper: <a href="http://www.ilads.org/files/harvey.pdf">‘Lyme disease’: ancient engine of an unrecognized borreliosis pandemic? </a>, published by <em>Medical Hypothesis</em>, not peer reviewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/11/the-mrfs-new-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Changing Morgellons Research Foundation</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/10/the-changing-morgellons-research-foundation/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/10/the-changing-morgellons-research-foundation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quackery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2007/09/10/the-changing-morgellons-research-foundation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Morgellons Research Foundation seems to be undergoing a slow meltdown. After the split with the New Morgellons Order last year they have been relatively quiet. Recently though, they stopped asking people to register at the Oklahoma State University, and instead started heavily soliciting donations directly to the MRF. Then, in conjunction with releasing their <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/10/the-changing-morgellons-research-foundation/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Morgellons Research Foundation seems to be undergoing a slow meltdown.  After the split with the New Morgellons Order last year they have been relatively quiet.  Recently though, they stopped asking people to register at the Oklahoma State University, and instead started heavily soliciting donations directly to the MRF.</p>
<p>Then, in conjunction with releasing their latest <a href="http://morgellons.org/newsletters.htm">newsletter</a>, the MRF updated their <a href="http://morgellons.org/">main page</a> with some rather unusual language:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Morgellons Research Foundation (MRF) is a 501(c) 3 non-profit organization dedicated to raising awareness and research funding for a seriously misconceptualized illness that we have provisionally labeled &#8220;<em>Morgellons disease</em>&#8220;. The name Morgellons disease was borrowed as a temporary label by the biologist mother of a two-year-old boy who became chronically ill in 2001, one component of which was visible ‘fibers” protruding from facial skin. The eventual placeholder name came from (1) isolated attention to the skin lesions and (2) after realizing the boy&#8217;s illness <em>did not</em> fit the label <em>Delusions of Parasitosis </em>given him by medical clinicians. In a search for others like her son, the biologist created a website for intercommunication. By 2002, she had been contacted by patients from all 50 states as well as globally reporting similar symptoms. The sheer magnitude and rapidity of response compelled creation of the MRF.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s very odd.  It has never been suggested, by Leitao or anyone else, that her son had been diagnosed with DOP.  Nobody is going to diagnose a two-year-old boy with delusions.  The rather odd phrasing here suggests this was not written by Mary Leitao.</p>
<p>The page was updated after a few hours to read (as of 9/10/2007, 4:30PST, changes <font color="#993366"><strong>highlighted</strong></font>):</p>
<blockquote><p> The eventual placeholder name came from (1) isolated attention to the skin lesions and (2) after realizing the boy&#8217;s illness <em>did not</em> fit the label <font color="#993366"><strong><em>Atopic Dermatitis </em></strong></font>given him by medical clinicians. In a search for others like her son, the biologist <strong><font color="#993366">found that a third had been formally diagnosed with <em>Delusions of Parasitosis</em>.</font></strong>  By 2002, <strong><font color="#993366">after creating a website, she was</font></strong> contacted by patients from all 50 states as well as<strong> <font color="#993366">fifteen other nations</font></strong> reporting similar symptoms. The sheer magnitude and rapidity of response compelled creation of the MRF.</p></blockquote>
<p>Seems like someone realized their mistake.</p>
<p>The page continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>Following a recent clinical database study of patients, <em>the cause and treatment of Morgellons disease are now becoming known, as is the probable mode of transmission.</em>  We now know the disease affects people of all age groups, including children.  Numerous family members are usually affected simultaneously, and epidemiology review suggests the disease appears to be spreading rapidly since 1980. (The number of families currently registered with the MRF, although large, is thought to represent a fraction of the true number affected.) <em>The disease as we now know it to be, IS currently recognized by the medical community.</em> It was erroneously labeled <em>Delusions of Parasitosis</em>, a name now poised to join the egregious dinosaurs of medical nosology (naming). Because of this misconceptualization combined with practitioner indolence, all patient symptoms had been assumed to be emotionally generated, with little attention to the skin or other organ systems. Curiously, NO serious search for parasites exists in the published medical literature.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again rather odd.  DOP has been recognized as a condition for over a hundred years.  There is no doubt that it exists.  The above seems to be suggesting that all cases diagnosed as DOP are actually &#8220;Morgellons&#8221;.  this will come as news to Randy Wymore, director of the OSU  Center for the Investigation ofMorgellons Disease, who says:</p>
<blockquote><p> Delusions of parasites (DOP) is a diagnosable condition [...] Of the many thousands who have self-reported at the OSU web-based registration site we do not know whether 1% actually suffer from DOP or 90%.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps  this disagreement is responsible for the widening split between the MRF and OSU.</p>
<p>Finally, regarding the CDC investigation, the MRF now says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Recently the CDC has taken a public stance regarding the still-undefined “Morgellons disease”. Fairly certain this position was engendered by political and patient pressure, we are nevertheless glad they are willing to review information on mostly self-diagnosed chronically ill patients, as we feel certain this will bring to light the full spectrum of illnesses represented by the Morgellons class of chronically ill persons.</p></blockquote>
<p>This baffles me.  They seem to be admitting that the CDC is performing an investigation without any evidence to support that investigation, and that Morgellons is actually a wide variety of illnesses.</p>
<p>So who is writing this?  Not Leitao, Savely or Stricker, they are much more reasonable and level headed.   Not pez1103, the MRF&#8217;s advocacy coordinator, she does not use language like &#8220;egregious dinosaurs of medical nosology&#8221;</p>
<p>I suspect that this rather chaotic and discordant editing might be <a href="http://www.eblue.org/article/PIIS0190962207001958/fulltext#bib2">William T. Harvey&#8217;s work</a>.  He&#8217;s  the chairman of the board of the MRF.   I suspect that he&#8217;s going to announce that he&#8217;s discovered that Morgellons is a multiple set of illnesses and opportunistic parasitic infections caused by an altered immune system compromised by infection by Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease). [EDIT: Wrong, they are claiming it's worms]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/09/10/the-changing-morgellons-research-foundation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MRF Halts OSU Registration</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/08/11/mrf-halts-osu-registration/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/08/11/mrf-halts-osu-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2007/08/11/mrf-halts-osu-registration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a few years, the Morgellons Research Foundation (MRF) has been registering people who think they have symptoms of something like Morgellons. Last year the registration was moved over to Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences (OSU-CHS), and the the MRF linked to that page, and recommended that people register. In the last couple <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/08/11/mrf-halts-osu-registration/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a few years, the Morgellons Research Foundation (MRF) has been registering people who think they have symptoms of something like Morgellons.  Last year the registration was moved over to Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences (OSU-CHS), and the the MRF linked to that page, and recommended that people register.</p>
<p>In the last couple of weeks, this has changed quite significantly.  Firstly the OSU added a bit of text to <a href="https://centernet.okstate.edu/morgellons/registration.cfm">their registration page</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>NOTE:</strong><br />
Information submitted to OSU will be kept in confidence and not shared with other organizations.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, I think this is because, as Wymore said a couple of days ago: &#8220;<strong>The president of the [OSU] medical school has, in the last six months, authorized a center for the investigation of Morgellons disease, in Tulsa, at the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences</strong>&#8220;.  Since it&#8217;s now a proper university authorized research program, authorized by the president (<a href="http://www.healthsciences.okstate.edu/admin/president/bio.html">John Fernandes</a>, I assume) , they have to follow certain legal procedures, like not sharing information (like email addresses) gathered from patients.</p>
<p>What this means, of course, is that the OSU can no longer share the registration information with the MRF (and it was perhaps somewhat legally dubious they were doing so in the first place).  Now, you would think the MRF would obviously still encourage people to register with the OSU, but actually, no.  The MRF actually has removed all mention of registration from their web site, starting with the &#8220;Register&#8221; link that used to appear on every page.</p>
<p>They also changed the <a href="http://morgellons.org/">welcome page</a> from:</p>
<blockquote><p>Please register with us. Your information will be kept confidential.</p></blockquote>
<p>to:</p>
<blockquote><p>Please sign up for our newsletter below.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then on the <a href="http://morgellons.org/advocacy.htm">advocacy page</a>, under &#8220;Here are some of the ways you can become involved.&#8221;, the old text</p>
<blockquote><p>2. Register with the MRF. Your registration is vital to our efforts, because it makes decision-makers aware of the multitudes of people who are suffering from this disease.  Hopefully, we can interest politicians, if many of their constituents are affected.  Your information will be kept confidential.  To Register click here (link to OSU-CHS)</p></blockquote>
<p>was changed to:</p>
<blockquote><p>Email Advocacy@Morgellons.org if you have ideas for increasing awareness and raising funds for research, or if you want to get involved.</p></blockquote>
<p>The link to the OSU registration also appeared on all previous MRF Newsletters, but was removed as of the August 2007 Newsletter.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s going on?  Why does the MRF no longer inform people about the OSU registration?  I suspect this is because now that the OSU is no longer sharing the registration data with the MRF, the MRF no longer gets the email addresses of those people.  Since the MRF seems much more strongly focussed on fund raising now (requesting $233,000 for research, probably by advisory board member Kilani&#8217;s <a href="http://www.clongen.com/morgellons_disease.php">Clongen Labs</a>), they need as many email addresses as possible for money-raising efforts &#8211; especially new email addresses.</p>
<p>Perhaps it is also because the OSU registration page includes two links to the OSU Morgellons donation page, and one of the question you have to answer when registering is &#8220;<strong>Have you donated to Morgellons yet? (Y/N)</strong>&#8220;, followed by: &#8220;<strong>Click here to contribute to OSU Research on Morgellons</strong>&#8220;.  Perhaps the OSU registration was just taking too much money away from the MRF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/08/11/mrf-halts-osu-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brandi Koch</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/04/08/brandi-koch/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/04/08/brandi-koch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2007/04/08/brandi-koch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To: Smileykins&#8230; &#38; any other doubter who spends half their life on &#8220;MORG WATCH&#8221; Hello&#8230; this is Brandi Koch. I have resisted the urge to read over comments on this site for too long&#8230; my curiosity finally got the best of me. I noticed that someone calling themselves &#8220;Robert&#8221; threw a challenge out there for <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/04/08/brandi-koch/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: Smileykins&#8230; &amp; any other doubter who spends half their life on &#8220;MORG WATCH&#8221;</p>
<p>Hello&#8230; this is Brandi Koch. I have resisted the urge to read over comments on this site for too long&#8230; my curiosity finally got the best of me.</p>
<p>I noticed that someone calling themselves &#8220;Robert&#8221; threw a challenge out there for anyone to &#8220;go stay with the Koch&#8217;s for a couple of weeks&#8221;&#8230; you claimed to be un-phased by the idea/challenge, claiming that you would be more than happy to do so &amp; wondered if he could &#8220;arrange a visit&#8221;.</p>
<p>Well, he can&#8217;t&#8230; but, I can. I would be more than happy to welcome you into my home for a week or two&#8230; if you think that this is a joke&#8211;think again.<br />
<span id="more-203"></span><br />
I can assure you that if you were to spend so much as 2 days within my home you would not just see the amount of &#8220;normalcy&#8221; that I have strived to maintain for the sake of my children &amp; their birthright to a blissful, carefree childhood&#8230; but, you would also get a chance to see firsthand this matter that emerges from my pores usually after a hot shower, workout, or any other activity which would trigger my pores to &#8220;open&#8221;.</p>
<p>You would also see that not only do I not pick my skin, but that I have very few lesions. Believe it or not, this &#8220;matter&#8221; comes out of unbroken skin. Now, I suppose that may sound hard to believe to some&#8230; but, if you really think about it&#8211;there are many different types of matter which is excreted from the skin from sweat to the bacteria which causes acne (whiteheads, blackheads).</p>
<p>Admittedly, these symptoms sound completely insane and downright unfathomable. You are right-seeing IS believing. I have had at least 10 close family and friends witness this horrific phenomenon for themselves. They too, were understandably skeptical before seeing it with their own eyes. They are now terrified and extremely involved in helping myself and my family figure out how and why this is happening.</p>
<p>To have people devote such a great amount of time and effort trying to debunk an illness that they really know nothing about is the epitome of insult to injury. I am weak, tired, &amp; plain old SICK. I do not have the time or the desire to defend my sanity. I know what I know, &amp; I have thankfully received validity from the people that matter most to me in my life. I do however, realize that I have an obligation to prove this exist to anyone adamantly doubting it&#8217;s existence for the sake of research and help for all of those suffering.</p>
<p>Now, I do believe that SOME of the people claiming to have &#8220;this&#8221;, probably do not. Of course there will be the few that will jump on the already existing, so called &#8220;crazy train&#8221;. It&#8217;s inevitable. Just as it&#8217;s inevitable that there will be good and bad persons within any race or religion that exists. The point is&#8230; this is real. I wish it weren&#8217;t. I wish that I were simply &#8220;nuts&#8221;, but I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>I have also had the chance to show my symptoms to doctors. Just because you are not hearing about it, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not happening. SOME doctors are finally actually LOOKING &amp; listening.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you choose&#8230; you may pay me a visit. Of course, due to the fact that I do not know you, I would have security measures taken to ensure the safety of myself and my family &amp; would welcome you to do the same.</p>
<p>Now, what will you do if you are disproved? Would you turn your time and efforts into helping those suffering VS mocking and scoffing? I really cannot understand why you waste so much of your time trying to convince everyone that this is not real. are you trying to convince others, or maybe yourself? It seems like there are just 3 or 4 of you that devote hours to debating an issue that shouldn&#8217;t really even concern you if you are healthy and believe this illness is one of a delusional nature. Why the concern, or is it really a &#8220;LACK of concern&#8221; &amp; just an entertaining pastime of yours to try and discredit sick people.</p>
<p>The truth is the truth is the truth. It WILL come out. I know that you will opt not to listen to me&#8230; but, I can assure you&#8211;this IS real. I wish it weren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So, take it for what it&#8217;s worth. You want proof? I have it. Come on down. I&#8217;ll even pay for your airline ticket &amp; pick you up at the airport. I can promise you that you will be treated with 10 times the respect that you have given those of us who are suffering in such a horrible manner. Hey, bring your 2-3 friends&#8230; like I said-I will have a body/security guard here to make sure it&#8217;s a peaceful visit. I don&#8217;t have the energy to fight/argue with anyone. I just want help before this gets &#8220;up close and personal&#8221; with those of you who aren&#8217;t suffering &amp; before my kids become even more ill. I wouldn&#8217;t wish &#8220;this&#8221; on my worst enemy.</p>
<p>Lastly, if you would like, you may post my email as long as you leave my email address out and print IN FULL the ENTIRE letter. I&#8217;m sure this would cause quite a &#8220;stir&#8221; within the &#8220;MORG WATCH&#8221; community. I don&#8217;t want or need the attention-I need a cure.</p>
<p>Warm Regards,<br />
Brandi Koch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/04/08/brandi-koch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>337</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgellons Money</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/30/morgellons-money/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/30/morgellons-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2006/10/30/morgellons-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In August 2006, Mary Leitao, the inventor of the Morgellons appellation and founder of the Morgellons Research Foundation, came under some scrutiny for lack of accounting for monies donated to the MRF.  She had this to say: &#8220;It has been the most bizarre situation,&#8221; Ms. Leitao said in an interview. &#8220;We&#8217;re talking little, tiny chunks <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/30/morgellons-money/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In August 2006, Mary Leitao, the inventor of the Morgellons appellation and founder of the Morgellons Research Foundation, came under some scrutiny for lack of accounting for monies donated to the MRF.  She had this to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It has been the most bizarre situation,&#8221; Ms. Leitao said in an interview. &#8220;We&#8217;re talking little, tiny chunks of money. I will tell you, the year 2004, there were $318 worth of donations. And $100 of those came from me. I donated a check to my own foundation to jump-start us.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06226/713319-85.stm">http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06226/713319-85.stm</a></p></blockquote>
<p> Yet, three month&#8217;s earlier, she had personally signed the 990 tax form for the year 2005, which listed donations of<strong> $17,165</strong> and expenses of $2,819 and $1,715 on a new computer listed as an asset.</p>
<p>Why then did Leitao attempt to characterize the money involved as &#8220;tiny chunks&#8221;, when clearly thousands of dollars are involved? </p>
<p>The 990 form is available here:<br />
<a href="http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2005/020/723/2005-020723970-02561e28-Z.pdf">http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2005/020/723/2005-020723970-02561e28-Z.pdf</a><br />
(Free registration required)</p>
<p>Apparently $10,000 was donated by one person, who was then not able to get any information as to where the money went.<br />
<a href="http://morgellonsgroup.proboards23.com/index.cgi?board=general&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1157702900">http://morgellonsgroup.proboards23.com/index.cgi?board=general&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1157702900</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/30/morgellons-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whither Morgellons?</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/11/whither-morgellons/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/11/whither-morgellons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lymebusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/11/whither-morgellons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Morgellons&#8221; is the name Mary Leitao chose for what she considered to be a mysterious new illness afflicting her son. Doctors told her it was just eczema, and that the fibers she found on his lip were just lint. But she was determined it must be a novel new disease that she personally had discovered, <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/11/whither-morgellons/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Morgellons&#8221; is the name Mary Leitao chose for what she considered to be a mysterious new illness <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/04/11/objects-emerging-from-lesion-on-childs-lip-are-kleenex-fibers/">afflicting her son</a>.  Doctors told her it was just eczema, and that the fibers she found on his lip were just lint.  But she was determined it must be a novel new disease that she personally had discovered, so she set up a foundation to publicise it.  Eventually, via the internet, other people join her organization, the list of symptoms constituting &#8220;Morgellons&#8221; is expanded to include these new people.  Eventually the list of symptoms becomes very broad, and encompasses just about any medical condition.  <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/09/22/doctors-patients/">Doctors reject &#8220;Morgellons&#8221;</a>, since the <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/25/occams-menopause/">symptoms are explained by other diseases</a>, and are too varied and vague to constitute a working definition of a new disease.</p>
<p>But the &#8220;Foundation&#8221; continues on its mission of &#8220;raising awareness&#8221; of &#8220;this disease&#8221;. With lots of hard work they get some press coverage, then some local TV coverage, and then eventually <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/">some major TV coverage</a>.  Each time <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/07/28/morgellons-on-television/">the story is the same.</a>  Some patients are presented who are obviously ill.  Their doctors have told them Morgellons is not a real disease, and the fibers are just lint or hair.  Wymore says it is a real disease. The CDC is investigating.  The end.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=morgellons&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=2006" target="_blank" rel="attachment" title="viz.png"><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/images/viz.png" alt="viz.png" /></a><br />
As you can see here, Morgellons was a short-lived phenomenon.  The local media coverage spurred interest which faded away.  The <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/06/23/fibers-on-cnn/">CNN story</a> spurred some interested, but was limited by the audience.  Finally two huge spikes surround the networks morning shows and the <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/">&#8220;Primetime&#8221; special</a>, then nothing, it tails off to zero after the next two months.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s going on? Was Morgellons just a product of a media desperate for news during the silly season?  The MRF supplied them with an interesting sounding story, and they ran with it?  Then what happened? Where did Morgellons go?</p>
<p>People are still sick, that&#8217;s for sure.  People are still <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/07/22/morgellons-and-neurotic-excoriations/">going to the doctors with excoriations</a>, and <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/13/occams-hot-tub/">with itching</a>, and with fatigue, and with baggies of fibers.  That&#8217;s not going to stop.  There are a <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/09/14/hystorical-context/">variety of reasons for that</a>, and those reasons are not going away.</p>
<p>But &#8220;Morgellons&#8221; has gone away.  It was a label someone decided to put on a bunch of symptoms without any evidence to indicate that anything unusual was happening, and contrary to the opinions of the entire medical community.  A few people publicised it very well for a period of time.  The media ran the story, but  now they&#8217;ve &#8220;done that&#8221;, and there will be no more stories.</p>
<p>Save the inevitable CDC report on &#8220;insufficient evidence&#8221;, the inexplicable advocacy of Professor Wymore, and the interminable and sad believer&#8217;s theories on Morgellons discussion boards, Morgellons is over.</p>
<p>Morgellons is over, but people are still sick.  They are probably more sick now than when the MRF started their media campaign.  By popularizing &#8220;Morgellons&#8221; as an actual disease, it gave validity to those who disagree with their doctors, self diagnosed, and <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/06/11/why-does-the-mrf-recommend-lymebusters/">chose inappropriate treatments</a>.  Morgellons is over, but <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/06/29/the-trouble-with-cotton-socks/">the damage is done</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/10/11/whither-morgellons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>802</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC &#8216;Morgellons&#8217; Medical Mystery</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Medical Mysteries&#8221; series is proving to be quite a money maker for ABC. The New York Daily News reports: It&#8217;s been a challenging summer for the usually dominant ABC. How tough? Reality offerings have crashed and burned. Few are watching reruns of &#8220;Lost,&#8221; &#8220;Grey&#8217;s Anatomy&#8221; and &#8220;Desperate Housewives.&#8221; But things are looking up. ABC <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Medical Mysteries&#8221; series is proving to be quite a money maker for ABC.   The <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/ent_radio/story/441281p-371736c.html">New York Daily News reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s been a challenging summer for the usually dominant ABC. How tough? Reality  offerings have crashed and burned. Few are watching reruns of &#8220;Lost,&#8221; &#8220;Grey&#8217;s  Anatomy&#8221; and &#8220;Desperate Housewives.&#8221; But things are looking up. ABC News&#8217;  &#8220;Medical Mysteries&#8221; series, which examines bizarre medical conditions, has  turned out to be a real crowd- pleaser.</p></blockquote>
<p>So it&#8217;s not surprising that they would continue to promote the series, and as part of this promotion offer up a<a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=2283503"> preview story on their ABC &#8220;news&#8221; site</a>, right next to the wolfman, the echolocating blind men, and the women who smell like dead fish.</p>
<p>The ABC Story features Morgellons Patients: Brandi Koch, Anne Dill, Greg Smith and also Mary Leitao, the founder of the MRF, and her son, Drew.</p>
<p>Leitao&#8217;s part in the story is interesting, since it explains the start of the Morgellons phenomenon:</p>
<blockquote><p>Armed with research, Leitao took her son to a doctor at one of the country&#8217;s  leading hospitals. He dismissed her tale of fibers and wrote to her  pediatrician, saying that her son needed Vaseline for his lips and that his  mother needed a thorough psychiatric evaluation.</p></blockquote>
<p>well, you would think that the next logical step in the story would be to explain how she found her son&#8217;s fibers were not normal, and disproved all the doctors, but no, we get:</p>
<blockquote><p>Undaunted, Leitao began poring through the medical literature looking for  clues. What she discovered was a 17th-century reference to a strange disease  with &#8220;harsh hairs&#8221; called &#8220;morgellons.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>A disease where infants have a fever, and then you rub milk on them, hairs spring from their backs, which you pluck, and the fever vanishes.  Nothing to do with anything.  Why do they keep bringing this up?</p>
<p>What does Mary say about Drew&#8217;s fibers:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What I saw were bundles of fibers, balls of fibers,&#8221; Leitao says. &#8220;There was  red and blue.&#8221; Even stranger, they glowed under ultraviolet light.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have explained<a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/07/11/fuzzballs/"> red and blue fibers before</a>.   I&#8217;ve also <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/07/30/white-fibers-fluoresce-blue-under-uv/">explained the glowing</a> (although that&#8217;s usually white fibers, which Mary also found, just did not mention in this story).  I&#8217;ve even discussed the <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/04/11/objects-emerging-from-lesion-on-childs-lip-are-kleenex-fibers/">fibers emerging from his lip</a>.  There is no evidence at all that Drew had anything at all unusual going on.</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s something I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dr. Greg Smith of Gainesville, Ga., has been a pediatrician for the past 28  years. He claims a fiber is coming out of his big toe, and he has video footage  to prove it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Video footage of fibers emerging is <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/07/25/its-the-fibers-stupid/">something I&#8217;ve been suggesting for a while.</a>  The fibers are the only really interesting thing about &#8220;this disease&#8221; for which you might have a chance of getting some evidence.</p>
<p>The rest of the article is similar to other media articles.  Anne Dill (who has a <a href="http://www.funtigo.com/AnneDill?g=1029121&amp;cr=1&amp;rfm=y">very impressive photo gallery</a>) says her husband died of Morgellons, but he was actually diagnosed with ALS.  4500 people are supposed to have contacted Leitao, when <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/06/30/how-many-people-have-morgellons/">all they did was fill in an internet survey</a>.  A doctor says that the <a href="http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/07/22/morgellons-and-neurotic-excoriations/">lesions form when people scratch themselves</a>.But the real news, and what I suspect that MRF were so excited about before they collapsed, is that the Tulsa City police department were unable to identify some fibers collected from a Morgellons Patient by Randy Wymore:</p>
<blockquote><p>Forensic scientist Ron Pogue at the Tulsa Police Crime Lab in Oklahoma  checked a morgellons sample against known fibers in the FBI&#8217;s national database.  &#8220;No, no match at all. So this is some strange stuff,&#8221; Pogue says. He thinks the  skeptics are wrong. &#8220;This isn&#8217;t lint. This is not a commercial fiber. It&#8217;s not.&#8221;</p>
<p>The lab&#8217;s director, Mark Boese, says the fibers are &#8220;consistent with  something that the body may be producing.&#8221; He adds, &#8220;These fibers cannot be  manmade and do not come from a plant. This could be a byproduct of a biological  organism.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What kind of obscure biological organism produces fibers? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombyx_mori">Bombyx mori</a>? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinchilla">Rodentia Chinchillidae</a>? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep">Ovis aries</a>?  Exactly how extensive is this FBI national database, and how do you check a sample against it?  Here&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.postgazette.com/pg/06204/707970-85.stm">earlier mention</a> of the involvement of the Tulsa Police:</p>
<blockquote><p>The fibers, about the size of small eyebrow hairs, are not living organisms, Dr. Wymore decides. He teams with a Tulsa police department crime lab to sort through fiber samples, and though the lab owns a database of more than 800 fibers, these fibers match nothing.</p></blockquote>
<p>800 fibers does not sound like very many to me.  I bet they don&#8217;t have this one:<img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/images/mystery-60x-1.jpg" alt="mystery-60x-1.jpg" /></p>
<p>or this one:</p>
<p><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/images/mystery-60x-2.jpg" alt="mystery-60x-2.jpg" /><br />
I&#8217;ve got more.  My point is that 800 fibers might cover 90% of the common household fibers found in your average bit of lint, but there&#8217;s still probably over 10,000 other uncommon fibers like the above &#8211; lots of room for unidentified fibers.  (A prize to the first person to correctly identify the above two photos &#8211; they are from a QX5 at 60x, so are about 3mm across).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a natural man-made fiber (the large one on the bottom right):</p>
<p><img src="http://morgellonswatch.com/images/mystery-60x-5.jpg" alt="mystery-60x-5.jpg" /><br />
I KNOW they don&#8217;t have that one in their fiber database.  Why?  I made it myself, simply by firmly rubbing my upper arm with a fingertip after having a hot shower.  Some old sun-dried skin sloughed off, and rolled up with natural skin oil and sebum, forming this fiber-like shape.   Everyone has these &#8220;fibers&#8221; from time to time, not everyone really looks at them with a microscope, or asks the police to identify them.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a much better article on Morgellons, from the Associated Press:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/living/health/15227993.htm">http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/living/health/15227993.htm</a></p>
<blockquote><p>He recruited two Oklahoma State faculty physicians. They tweezed fibers from beneath the skin of some Morgellons patients who visited the Oklahoma State Center for Health Sciences in Tulsa in February, Wymore said, and sent those samples to the Tulsa Police Department&#8217;s forensic laboratory.</p>
<p>The police checked the samples against carpet and clothing fibers and other materials, and conducted chemical analyses and other tests. Nothing matched, said Mark Boese, the police lab&#8217;s director.</p>
<p>&#8220;How it is being produced, I don&#8217;t know,&#8221; Boese said. He theorized the fibers could be produced by human hair follicles that somehow encapsulated pollutants processed by the body.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve nothing against the <a href="http://www.tulsapolice.org/laboratory.html">Tulsa Police forensic department</a> (although they do seem to be <a href="http://www.tulsapolice.org/recruiting/CSI%20banner.pdf">big fans of CSI</a>).  But again, all they have said is they cannot identify some fibers, and they don&#8217;t think they are man-made or plant fibers.   Hopefully more information will be forthcoming, but they have not explained how they have scientifically determined they are &#8220;some strange stuff&#8221;.  What tests were run?  What were the results of the tests?    The Tulsa police has <a href="http://www.tulsapolice.org/lab/equipment.html">some nice equipment</a>.  Were these tests run with public money?  Can we have the results?</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;ll see more more details on the show.  But remember, ABC is here to entertain you, their aim is to build market share.  Keep that in mind, when weighing their evidence.  Is it possible that there is some less entertaining evidence?  How many fibers were looked at?  How many of those fibers were simply not entertaining enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/08/abc-morgellons-medical-mystery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>263</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MRF Reshuffle</title>
		<link>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/06/mrf-reshuffle/</link>
		<comments>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/06/mrf-reshuffle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.109.216.142/2006/08/06/mrf-reshuffle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The changes at the Morgellons Research Foundation continue, after removing all references to nurses, and expruging Dr. Randy Wymore, Dr. Greg Smith, Charlse Holman and Cindy Casey, William Harvey is the new Chairman of the board. The text &#8220;For our first Corporate Donation. Thanks to all the folks at SeaChange for their support..&#8221; has vanished <a href='http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/06/mrf-reshuffle/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The changes at the Morgellons Research Foundation continue, after removing all references to nurses, and expruging Dr. Randy Wymore, Dr. Greg Smith, Charlse Holman and Cindy Casey, William Harvey is the new Chairman of the board.</p>
<p>The text &#8220;<strong>For our first Corporate Donation. Thanks to all the folks at SeaChange for their support..&#8221;</strong> has vanished from the &#8220;sponsors&#8221; page.  One wonders if this has anything to do with the recent allegations of financial problems.</p>
<p>The photo with the large check is also gone from that page (although it&#8217;s still on the site).<br />
<a href="http://morgellons.org/img/bgchk3.jpg">http://morgellons.org/img/bgchk3.jpg</a></p>
<p>I was wondering if they were going airbrush people out of that photo, given the swiftness of the removal of their names from the site .  But I guess there were too many people to remove.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s too early to comment on the meaning of all this, so I&#8217;ll wait and see how things pan out.  </p>
<p>Of note is the big ABC Primetime: Medical Mysteries on Wednesday night at 10PM.  This is the great hope of the MRF, something they have been working on for months.  It&#8217;s airing will be a turning point, one way or another. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/08/06/mrf-reshuffle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

